Model for Digital Services in Libraries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26713/jims.v9i4.989Keywords:
Digital Library, Quality Library Services, Service Quality EffectivenessAbstract
With the new method of information delivery for the library, the quality of service and Digital Library issues become paramount importance. Various model and framework have been proposed to evaluate the Quality of Service in Digital Library. Unfortunately, features that contribute towards the Digital Library services quality have not been factored into the design of most existing quality of services model in Digital Library. This paper presented a result of hypothesis testing which eventually proposed a new conceptual model on the service quality of the digital library. This model incorporated two new features that determine the right third-party source services. It also offers an opportunity for further investigation for evaluating the service quality effectiveness in the digital library. It is conforming to the study backgrounds through a variety of research designs and settings by examination of the hypotheses presented in this study. Survey research designs employing third party sources services as a sample in the model would best match the requirements for validating the proposed framework. The result shows that all three hypotheses are supported. As a result, we propose a conceptual model for evaluating the service quality of the digital library and further analyze the effectiveness model with several contributing features grouped as a thirdparty source.Downloads
References
M. Ahmad, Service Level Agreements Framework for Digital Library Quality of Service Management, Doctoral Dissertation, Deakin University, Australia, 2015.
K. Kaur and D. Singh, Modelling web-based library service quality, Library information Science Research 34(3) (2012), 184 – 196.
X. Shi and S. Levy, A theory-guided approach to library services assessment, College and Research Libraries 66(3) (2005), 266 – 277.
C. Cook, A mixed-method approach to the identification and measurement of academic library service quality constructs: LibQUAL+TM,” Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Available from Proquest Dissertation Abstracts International (UMI No. 3020024), 2001.
B. Sam and H. D. Carlson, Library/Vendor Relationships, Haworth Information Press, Binghamton, New York, 2006.
S. Gardner and S. Eng, What students want: generation Y and the changing function of the academic library portal, Libraries and the Academy 5(3) (2005), 405 – 420.
S. Nicholson, A conceptual framework for the holistic measurement and cumulative evaluation of library services, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 41(1) (2005), 496 – 506.
M. Fassnacht and I. Koese, Quality electronic services: conceptualizing and testing a hierarchical model, Journal of Service Research 9(1) (2006), 19 – 37.
M. Ahmad, J. Abawajy and T. H. Kim, Service quality assessment in the provision of library services, in U- and E-Service, Science and Technology, T. H. Kim et al. (eds), Springer, Berlin ” Heidelberg, 83 – 92, 2011.
M. Ahmad and J. Abawajy, Digital library service quality assessment model, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 129, 571 – 580, 2014.
C. Ringle et al., SmartPLS 2.0.M3, 2004, available online: http://www.smartpls.de.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CCAL that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.