Behaviour of Concrete Filled Steel Tubes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26713/jims.v10i1-2.1056Keywords:
CFST, Load-strain, Push out test, ANSYSAbstract
Concrete filled steel tubular columns are preferred due to their excellent static and dynamic resistant properties such as high strength, high ductility and large energy absorption capacity. The comparison of the ultimate strength of CFST with Hollow steel tube, RCC and the bond strength between concrete and the steel was done both experimentally and analytically using ANSYS. A total of 18 specimens were cast, out of which ultimate strength was determined for 13 specimens and bond strength was observed for 5 specimens using push out test. Both experimental and analytical observations using ANSYS were carried on a cylinder of height 460mm and a diameter of 113mm. The grade of concrete used for infill is M30. The tests were carried on an Ultimate Testing Machine. The ultimate strength of CFST, RCC and HST were compared and CFST having the advantages of both concrete and steel is found to behave better and average bond strength ranges between 0.7 to 1.1N/mm\(^2\).Downloads
References
EN 1994 ” Part 2, Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures, https: //www.icevirtuallibrary.com/doi/book/10.1680/dcscs.41738.
B. Evirgen, A. Tuncan and K. Taskin, Structural behaviour of concrete filled steel tubular sections under axial compression, Thin Walled Structures 80 (2014), 46 – 56.
P. Gupta, S.K. Sarda and M.S. Kumar, Experimental and computational study of concrete filled steel tubular columns under axial loads, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 63 (2007), 182 – 193.
K. Sakino, H. Nakahara, S. Morino and I. Nishiyama, Behaviour of centrally loaded concrete-filled steel-tube short columns, Journal of Structural Engineering 130 (2) (2004), 180 – 188.
Khodaie and Nahmat, Effect of the concrete strength on the concrete-steel bond in concrete filled steel tubes, Journal of the Persian Gulf (Marine Science) 4 (11) (2013), 9 – 16.
L. Kwasniewski, E. Szmigiera and M. Siennicki, Finite element modelling of composite concrete steel sections, Archives of Civil Engineering 4 (2012), 373 – 388.
C.W. Roeder, B. Cameron and C.B. Brown, Composite action in concrete filled tubes, Journal of Structural Engineering 125 (5) (1999), 477 – 484.
S.P. Schneider, Axially loaded concrete filled steel tubes, Journal of Structural Engineering 12 (1998), 1125 – 1138.
Z. Tao, Z.B. Wang and Q. Yu, Finite element modelling of concrete filled steel tubes columns under axial compression, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 89 (2013), 121 – 131.
T.-Y. Song, Z. Tao, B. Uy and L.-H. Han, Bond strength in full-scale concrete-filled steel tubular columns, in Proceeding of World congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Incheon, Korea, pp. 25 – 29 (2015).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CCAL that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.